Ten Commandments

We are all probably familiar with the Ten Commandments of Exodus and Deuteronomy in the Bible. It is often claimed that they are instrumental to the development of our nation's set of laws. David Limbaugh wrote, "Much of our Bill of Rights is biblically based, as well, and the Ten Commandments and further laws set out in the book of Exodus form the basis of our Western law."

Are they? Are they really the basis of our modern law?

Here's the list as found in Exodus 20:3-17. This is the traditional Christian way of dividing it up, you might have learned it a little differently.

1. You shall have no other gods before me.
2. You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.
3. You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.
4. Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.
5. Honor your father and your mother, so that you may live long in the land the Lord your God is giving you.
6. You shall not murder.
7. You shall not commit adultery.
8. You shall not steal.
9. You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.
10. You shall not covet your neighbor’s house. You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his male or female servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.

 For ease of discussion, let's shorten it up a bit.

1. One god
2. No idols
3. Don't misuse name of god
4. No work on holy Sabbath by anyone/anything
5. Honor parents
6. No murder
7. No screwin' around on your spouse
8. No theft
9. No perjury
10. Don't want other people's spouses and stuff

Can these be seen as the genesis of American law? I don't think there is a case.

First, there is the pesky First Amendment in the Bill of Rights which guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of religious involvement. So the first four commandments are impossible to rectify with the Constitution, and therefore American law. We permit all religions to peacefully coexist, we defend the artist's right to respectfully depict gods in their work even if it is offensive (the taboo against offending Muslims with representations of Allah is not in US law), we protect the right to even religiously offensive speech so long as it is not obscene or directly inciting violence, and even religious bookstores are open seven days a week.

There goes 40% of the case against the Ten Commandments influencing our laws.

I think it's a generally good idea to honor your parents. In the absolute worst case scenario, you must respect that if they had not met you would never have been born. In the best scenarios, they fed, taught, protected and nurtured you into an adult who still relies on their counsel often. I also think it's a generally good idea not to cheat on your spouse or to crave your neighbor's things. But nowhere in US law are these notions actually legislated.

There are some local laws against adultery and "deviant" sexual behavior, but these are being struck down on a regular basis because they are simply not supported by the Bill of Rights. And laws which require you to treat your parents with any more respect than other human beings or police your wants and desires would be seen as repugnant by thinking people, and cannot be supported by legal precedent in the US.

We are down to three remaining Commandments - the ones against murder, theft, and perjury. And these three are quite illegal in the US. So do we then have a 30% case for the Ten Commandments?

Not quite. The Sumerian Code of Ur-Nammu (c. 2100-2050 BCE) is the oldest verifiable prohibition of murder, robbery and perjury. By contrast, the book of Exodus was not written much prior to 600 BCE. In other words, if I wrote something based on the Canterbury Tales, it would not be original work but a derivative - and the time between Ur-Nammu and the writer of Exodus is double the span of time between now and the 14th century.

Laws against murder, theft and perjury were not new in 600 BCE, they had been so for a millennia plus. Saying a work written in 600 BCE is the basis for our laws against stealing and killing and lying is like saying that the books by Emily Post are the reason we are polite to each other, or that Roe v Wade is the reason abortions started.

The facts are clear. 3 of these Commandments restate already established laws, and the other 7 just have no representation in American jurisprudence. Any argument that they form any basis for our system of laws, or the basis for any modern legal system, is simply baseless and wrong.

Posting these Commandments in a government building is not an homage to our laws and nation. It is a bald-faced homage to a deity, and that irksome First Amendment expressly forbids it. Remember than when you vote.

Atheists want to sin

One argument we hear from time to time against the very notion of atheism is that it is all just a scam. People claim that atheism is a means to allow a person to do sinful things and not feel guilty. In this way, an atheist can do things that directly defy, say, the Biblical God, but they will not feel shame because they deny the authority of God.

Well, I guess I have to agree.

We'll look at Matthew 15: 1-9 and see. I chose this specifically because there are Christians who argue up and down against the laws of Leviticus, that they aren't meant for our times, well, except for the ones against homosexuality apparently. The ones that say a woman who is raped but does not scream should be killed, that one doesn't apply to us. But that's a blog for another day.

But back to Matthew 15. We are kind of jumped in to the story. Apparently, the Jewish elders wash their hands prior to eating as a ritual act. The disciples did not. Also, it seems they made up a rule that things earmarked for the purpose of giving to God cannot be then re-purposed for helping your parents out.

Anyway, on with the story....

Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, "Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don’t wash their hands before they eat!"

Jesus replied, "And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? For God said, 'honor your father and mother' and 'anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.'

"But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is 'devoted to God,' they are not to 'honor their father or mother' with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition.

"You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you: 'These people honor me with their lips but their hearts are far from me. They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules.'"

Well, he sure told them.

Why is any of this relevant? He clearly believes the laws of God which we find in Exodus 21:17 and Leviticus 20:9 that "anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death." So no matter what you say about the Old Testament being an old, retired covenant and the Good News of the Gospel being the New Covenant, Jesus here clearly says that his father said that disrespectful children should be put to death.

At any rate, I think we can safely say that a good Christian is supposed to kill children who curse their parent. It's in the Old Testament twice. It's in the New Testament, said by Jesus himself.

How many of you have children who have cursed you? Did you kill them? Aren't you violating God's command by not killing them?

If letting a bratty kid live to see another sunrise is a sin, I'm happy to do it.

The only way I see to reconcile the above passage to make it so Jesus did not advocate killing children  is to assume he was mocking all law, but that destroys his credibility as the son and embodiment of the one deity. So that can't be so. He meant it.

If we accept that "all Scripture is given by inspiration of God " (2 Timothy 3:16) then we as men cannot cherry-pick it. (Galatians 1:9 "If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse!" and Deuteronomy 12:32 "See that you do all I command you; do not add to it or take away from it.") If we cannot ignore parts and hold other parts as true, then we must either accept it all or reject it all.

I submit that moral people still ignore portions of the Bible despite the aforementioned admonitions simply because, for example, they see that killing children is wrong. And if the moral compass of Jesus includes killing children who curse their parents, even if they have Tourette Syndrome, even if they have been poisoned and cannot control their actions, I submit that compass is broken, and a useless tool by which a moral, thinking man can navigate.

Thus, I reject the Bible as a determinant of what is moral and what is not. It is an unreliable text for guiding peaceful, compassionate coexistence. Morality cannot be ascertained through study of a millennia-old text but must be understood through practical and scientific interaction with the world in which we exist. If it is sinful to use more compassionate means of determining moral and right behavior than the Bible, I am proud to sin freely.